Deployment1
From WFilter Documents and Tutorials
(Difference between revisions)
| (3 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Pass-through deployment}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:Pass-through deployment}} | ||
| − | == Pass-through deployment | + | |
| − | *[[network_bridge|Network Bridge]] | + | = Pros and Cons = |
| + | Pros: | ||
| + | * Do not require a "port mirroring" device. | ||
| + | * UDP traffic can also be filtered in pass-through mode. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cons: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * More complicated to setup. | ||
| + | * You might need to change your network current topology. | ||
| + | * If the gateway/bridge server dies, you will lose internet access. | ||
| + | * If you prefer linux firewall solutions, please check: [http://www.wfilterngf.com WFilter NG firewall] | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Pass-through deployment examples = | ||
| + | * [[network_bridge|Network Bridge]] | ||
| + | * [http://www.wfiltericf.com/support/WFilter_4_1/Doc/deploy_win2003_gateway.htm Deploy WFilter with a windows 2003 gateway] | ||
| + | * [http://www.wfiltericf.com/support/WFilter_4_1/Doc/deploy_win2012_gateway.htm Deploy WFilter with a windows 2012 gateway] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Deployment]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Solutions]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:38, 9 August 2019
[edit] 1 Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Do not require a "port mirroring" device.
- UDP traffic can also be filtered in pass-through mode.
Cons:
- More complicated to setup.
- You might need to change your network current topology.
- If the gateway/bridge server dies, you will lose internet access.
- If you prefer linux firewall solutions, please check: WFilter NG firewall
